超级战舰

Proposed US rule barring China science collaboration sparks outcry from US scientists_我的网站

A |     

    China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post. 
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge. 
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said. 
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine. 
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation. 
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。    8月25日消息，近日，山东东营一段油罐车恶意别车的视频引发网络热议。    视频由后车内乘客拍摄记录，涉事危化品运输车因嫌前方轿车行驶速度偏慢，超车后多次别车，危险操作持续近3分钟。     据拍摄者介绍，事发国道，当时自己车辆行驶在最左侧车道，另有一台私家车在右侧车道，两车并排正常通行。    后方油罐车意图超车，希望前车进行避让。该路段小车限速70km/h，拍摄者车辆正按限速行驶，旁边私家车也并未避让。    车辆行至红绿灯路口停下后，这辆油罐车从最右侧车道加速超车，随后开始对右侧私家车实施别车行为，反复压线恶意干扰对方正常行驶，危险行为持续将近三分钟。     事件曝光后，不少网友喊话当地交警介入处置。    

    今日，山东东营交警发布警情通报：针对网传“一危化品运输车在行驶过程中别车”视频，东营交管部门迅速开展调查核实。    经查，2026年8月22日18时15分许，纪某（男，39岁）驾驶危化品运输车（空车）沿广青路由西向东行驶时，在超越前方车辆后连续变道、别车，影响后方车辆安全行驶，纪某对违法事实供认不讳。    依据《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》等法律法规，东营交管部门依法对纪某作出罚款250元、记3分的行政处罚，并对车辆所属企业下达隐患整改通知书，督促企业严格落实主体责任。

B |     

         

。

C |

Current article:http://h7m6krh.shuicengchongmingnouhuawang.bond/list_bmlbdq/sir.html

Published on:22:28:02